Surprising Results From Lance Hedrick Testing Distribution Tools (WDT, Autocomb, Moonraker, NCD, etc)

If you’re searching for the best coffee distribution tools tested by Lance Hedrick, look no further. Inside this article to reveal which tool reigns supreme. We cut through the noise to bring you a clear verdict so you can make an informed decision for your espresso crafting.

Key Takeaways

• The Weber Workshops Blind Shaker nailed it as the best coffee distribution tool in Lance Hedrick’s tests, standing out with higher extraction yields and more consistent shots.
• WDT is good but not always necessary. It’s mainly worth breaking out for clumpy grinders or if grinding right into the portafilter, otherwise, shaking does a solid job already.
• While the Blind Shaker tops the list, a balanced coffee-prep combo using a shaker + a distribution tool like the Moon Raker or the simple WDT might just brew up the ultimate espresso.

Who is Lance Hedrick?

Lance Hedrick is a well-known coffee expert, barista, and content creator from the United States. He gained popularity through his YouTube channel, where he shares his extensive knowledge and passion for coffee, providing tutorials, reviews, and insights on various topics such as brewing techniques, equipment, and coffee science. Hedrick's engaging and informative videos have earned him a large following within the coffee community, and he is widely respected for his expertise and contributions to the specialty coffee industry.

The Great Distribution Experiment: Lance Hedrick's Findings

In a bid to attain the perfect espresso, Lance Hedrick conducted a comprehensive experiment to assess the effects of various coffee distribution tools and methods. He focused particularly on the Weiss Distribution Technique (WDT) – a method known to improve coffee quality significantly by ensuring more de-clumped coffee grounds for more uniform extraction.

The incorporation of WDT in the espresso puck preparation routine significantly enhances the extraction process, reduces channeling, and results in more consistent espresso shots. However, the question remains, is WDT sufficient in achieving the ultimate perfect espresso? Let’s explore Lance’s methods to ascertain this.

Tested Methods

The quest of our coffee maestro to examine the best coffee distribution tools and methods was indeed exhaustive. Among the techniques put to the test were popular tools designed specifically for coffee distribution, like:

• WDT tool
• Moon Raker
• OCD (now known as distributor)
• 3D printed spirographic tool
• Auto Comb
• Weber Workshops Blind Shaker

But he didn’t stop there.

Furthermore, Hedrick drew a direct comparison between the shaking method of the Weber Workshops Blind Shaker and side-tapping, stirring with a WDT tool, and utilizing the Barista Hustle Autocomb. Each method was meticulously tested, and the results, as they say, were quite enlightening!

Testing Conditions

Hedrick’s meticulous nature shone through not only in his selection of tools but also in his rigorous testing conditions. He utilized:

• Single-origin, single-batch roast coffee
• Unica Pro espresso machine, calibrated to 93°C
• Flat 9 bar profile for 36-42 second shot times
• VST baskets for their real-world applicability

Every coffee dose was meticulously weighed to 20.0g ± 0.05g, ensuring a high level of precision using an Acaia Pyxis scale. Two grinders, the EG1 and the DF 64, were employed to evaluate consistency across different coffees and varying types of equipment.

The second dataset of shots was strategically spread out over several hours to control for variables such as machine temperature fluctuation and changes in bean characteristics.

The Winning Distribution Tool: Weber Workshops Blind Shaker

With the myriad of tools tested, it’s natural to wonder about the top performer. Without further ado, the laurels went to the Weber Workshops Blind Shaker! This tool was unexpectedly identified as the top-performing distribution tool in Lance Hedrick’s tests.

In repeated datasets, the Blind Shaker consistently achieved higher extraction yields than other tested methods. But why did it perform so well, you might ask? Let’s explore the answer.

A screenshot from Lances Video showing the results from different tools

How It Works

The Weber Workshops Blind Shaker is no ordinary tool. Its design is influenced by that of a cocktail shaker and is intended to minimize channelling and improve extraction by increasing Total Dissolved Solids (TDS). To use it, users grind coffee into a lidded cup, seal it, shake it for several seconds, and finally transfer it into a portafilter for an even distribution of grounds.

The physical shaking involved in the Blind Shaker’s usage is theorized to create a densification effect. This is where the coffee grounds are compacted, thereby fitting into a tighter space and ensuring a more uniform water flow during extraction. After shaking and transferring the grounds, users notice that the Blind Shaker generally allows for an even distribution of coffee grounds within the portafilter basket.

Comparing Results

When it comes to performance, the Blind Shaker stood out from the crowd. Scoring 7% higher than most other contenders, the Blind Shaker’s performance was statistically significant. A more consistent shot time and higher extraction yields were observed when the coffee grounds were shaken, particularly with the Blind Shaker.

To truly understand the Blind Shaker’s prowess, consider its direct comparison with other tools. Not only did it surpass all other tools, but the difference was statistically significant, highlighting its superior performance and making it a must-have in your coffee brewing arsenal.

Other Notable Distribution Tools and Techniques

While the Blind Shaker emerged victorious, it’s worth noting that other methods and tools also held their own. Among the tested tools was the Moon Raker, an innovative tool designed to de-clump and evenly distribute coffee grounds in espresso puck prep using a spirographic movement.

Another notable tool is the OCD (distributor), which, along with the horizontal tapping method, primarily affects the top layer of the coffee bed. Let’s delve deeper into these two methods and another underperforming contender, the Auto Comb.

OCD (Distributor) vs. Horizontal Tapping

Both the OCD (distributor) and horizontal tapping methods are utilized to ready the coffee bed prior to extraction, predominantly influencing the top layer of the coffee bed with marginal difference in their effectiveness. This means that the choice between using an OCD (distributor) or horizontal tapping may come down to personal preference or workflow convenience.

Auto Comb's Underperformance

On the other end of the spectrum, we have the Auto Comb. Despite its innovative design, the Auto Comb was found to have extracted the least during testing. The suspected reason for Auto Comb’s underperformance is that the dosing method it utilizes likely already provides adequate distribution, making further distribution unnecessary.

Despite this, Lance Hedrick suggests that a combination of shaking and the use of a distribution tool like the Auto Comb could potentially be the most effective method for making espresso.

Grinder Considerations for Distribution

When discussing coffee distribution, we can’t overlook the role of grinders. In recent years, the specialty coffee industry has witnessed a shift towards on-demand grinders over dosing grinders. This is due to a desire for fresher coffee and more precise control over taste-affecting variables.

While on-demand grinders grind directly into the portafilter, offering peak freshness and reducing oxidation and flavor loss, they can present challenges like clumping when grinding directly into portafilters. This can influence the distribution and ultimately the taste of the coffee.

Clumping Issues

Clumping in coffee grinders can indeed be a significant annoyance. It can occur due to excessive oils in the coffee, complicating flow from the grinding chamber to the chute, or an electrostatic charge from the grinding process. Darker roasts or older coffee beans, which have higher oil content, are more prone to cause clumping as oils from the beans can adhere to grinder burrs and clog the equipment.

Not only does clumping complicate the grinding process, but it can also impact the flavor of your espresso. Clumps can contribute to channelling during espresso extraction, potentially resulting in uneven extraction and therefore negatively impacting flavor and mouthfeel. To combat clumping, baristas might adjust the grind size, clean grinders regularly to remove oil buildup, or utilize grinders with features specifically designed to minimize clumping.

Doug Weber's Moon Raker Suggestion

For further optimization of the distribution process, Doug Weber, the creator of the Blind Shaker, recommends employing the Moon Raker as the concluding step. This gentle settling of the grounds after using the Blind Shaker can make a significant difference in creating that perfect, uniform coffee bed.

The Verdict: Is Deep WDT Necessary?

Following the extensive testing and analysis, one might question the real necessity of Deep WDT. According to Lance Hedrick’s data, the answer is – not always. Excessive WDT might not be necessary in most situations except when using a clumpy grinder or grinding directly into the portafilter.

So, while it’s always good to have a WDT tool at your disposal, you need not invest excessive time in deep WDT unless you’re faced with specific conditions that warrant it. In such cases, using wdt tools can be beneficial.

When to Use WDT

WDT proves beneficial when you’re dealing with grinders known to produce clumpy grounds. It breaks up clumps and makes coffee grounds fluffy and even before tamping, which is crucial for a consistent espresso extraction. WDT can mitigate clumping issues that may arise from static build-up when using a lever to dose from grinders, promoting a more uniform coffee bed.

Simplifying Your Workflow

Ultimately, the goal is to brew that perfect cup of espresso efficiently. Incorporating a combination tool that functions as both a tamper and distributor can significantly enhance efficiency by consolidating two essential steps into a single action. This not only saves time but also minimizes the equipment needed in your coffee brewing process.

Summary

Coffee distribution is an art that requires the right tools and techniques to perfect. From Lance Hedrick’s extensive tests, it’s evident that the Weber Workshops Blind Shaker stands out, offering superior extraction yields and consistency. But it doesn’t end there. Other tools like the Moon Raker and techniques like horizontal tapping also play a significant role in the coffee distribution process.

While Deep WDT isn’t always necessary, it proves beneficial when dealing with clumpy grinders or grinding directly into the portafilter. The key takeaway is to find a method and tool that best suits your workflow and coffee preferences. After all, the ultimate goal is a perfect, delicious cup of espresso, brewed just the way you like it.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Weiss distribution tool?

A Weiss Distribution Tool, or WDT, is a method for distributing espresso by stirring the coffee in the portafilter with a fine needle or similar tool. It helps to ensure an even extraction.

What was the top-performing tool in Lance Hedrick's tests?

The Weber Workshops Blind Shaker was the top-performing tool in Lance Hedrick's tests. It outperformed the competition in the tests.

What causes clumping in coffee grinders?

Clumping in coffee grinders can be caused by excessive oils in the coffee, environmental conditions, or an electrostatic charge from the grinding process. Be mindful of these factors to prevent clumping.

How can I simplify my coffee distribution workflow?

You can simplify your coffee distribution workflow by using a combination tool that works as both a tamper and distributor, streamlining two important steps into one. This can make your process more efficient and save time.